News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Using voltage glitching to unleash the A100 in my mining ... by octoberfranklin on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @01:03PM (#50456418)
there are several functions where blowing a fuse on an NVIDIA die can grant you more access, not less. In a properly secured design, a blown fuse should always induce a more restrictive state, because a blown fuse cannot be unblown in an economically feasible way.

Not really.

If the fuses are for security, sure. But these aren't.

These fuses are for economic extraction. Doing it the way NVIDIA did it is a safety feature: it ensures that blowing a fuse will never destroy economic value -- it will never turn a card that was previously able to do something correctly into a card that can no longer do that thing correctly.

Re:Using voltage glitching to unleash the A100 in my mining ... by swinglock on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @01:26PM (#50456718)
Though if it enables hardware that wasn't enabled because of binning, making the card unstable, can you go back you go back to having a working card?
Re:Using voltage glitching to unleash the A100 in my mining ... by nomel on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @01:31PM (#50456776)
No, that's absolutely not the perspective of the bean counters at hardware companies. The fuses are also for economic security. If someone wants more features, you make sure that they paid for them. You don't give away higher tier SKU functionality for free. This will be removed in the next revision, as have all the many other similar cases before it.

Product tiers come naturally with IC's, by disabling physical sections of the chip that can't work due to inevitable manufacturing defects. You don't throw defective chips away, you physically cut off those defective sections of the chip, with a saw or with a fuse, so you can sell it without that defect. This works great in the beginning, when your yields are low and you're still dialing in the manufacturing process. But, as yields increase, you might not have enough of the lower tier chips to meet demand. So you, just fuse otherwise good chips. Chips are cheap, after all!

There was probably some cost/engineering justification for it, but there's a very high chance that justification is looong gone. Chips are cheap, but revisions are expensive!