News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:100x Developers by dude250711 on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @12:42PM (#50456151)
What is this curious scaling obstacle that is preventing them from going to 1000x+?
Re:100x Developers by sneak on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @12:57PM (#50456352)
Reading speed, working memory. Agents are good coders, they are not good middle managers.
Re:100x Developers by rfgplk on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @01:06PM (#50456458)
For me personally? Local processing power. The reason I rolled my own harness environment is because my 16 core CPU was literally MAXED OUT with parallel compilation units and edit streams. A custom harness barely helped. Just allows me to run a few more sessions in parallel
Re:100x Developers by dude250711 on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @01:20PM (#50456615)
Should not spending more money on local processing power be a non-brainer then? You will make it all back and then some?
Re:100x Developers by krenel on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @02:29PM (#50457413)
Not 100% related, but I have a draft on a thought experiment: how would change if AI responses were immediate?

Like sub-second latency for _any_ change you ask it. Let it be 100 files changed, MR review and fix of each point, design document, anythikng.

Tool execution (eg: running tests) would be the next tech bottleneck. And human-on-the-loop the obvious one.

Maybe that's where 1000x productivity hides, who knows :)