News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Starlink Mini 2 by jmyeet on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @09:07AM (#50453604)
SpaceX is pushing for a global satellite-based mobile broadband and telecommunications network. People are bullish on it but I think they miss the point that you raise: SpaceX will still need to comply with local laws in every country they offer the service. Sure they won't need to build physical towers but legal compliance remains.

That means even if you're roaming SpaceX will need to comply. As such, the service won't really be useful unless they comply with the legal regimes in likely 100+ countries. That's a big issue. Not unsolvable but still big.

Re:Starlink Mini 2 by AnimalMuppet on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @09:22AM (#50453778)
As others have said, subsidiary companies. Perfectly normal, and SpaceX is certainly big enough to do so... if they're willing. I mean, the whole "move fast and break things" approach may lead to viewing regulations (especially other countries' regulations) as things you just ignore until they prove that you can't.

And, let's say that I'm a wanna-be SpaceX user in Namibia. I drive over the border to, say, Botswana. I buy a receiver. I drive back into Namibia. I may be illegal, but is SpaceX breaking the law? Even if they are, what can Namibia do to SpaceX about it? They can't do much, precisely because SpaceX has no business presence in Namibia.

Re:Starlink Mini 2 by BeFlatXIII on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @11:39AM (#50455400)
[delayed]