Or if I use software that has a pain point (like VLC not allowing play/pause on mouse click by default, because of the stupid DVD legacy, that nobody uses the player for) - then a LLM generated quick fix is suitable.

There are good reasons to not accept LLM code outside of trusted, core contributors. But this is just ridiculous purity testing.

> The free labor you provide has to be artisanal, or you're not a "real" contributor.

Now I'm imagining an angry man, arms crossed, yelling this into a community garden from the seat of his excavator.

The real problem is skill atrophy. Already, many programmers claim they can’t work without the use of LLMs. It would not shock me if 95% of people calling themselves programmers today would not be able to code themselves out of a cardboard box a few years down the line. (And they’d see it as a good thing, too.)