News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Subagents Conwidered Harmful by bob1029 on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @07:59AM (#50452866)
[delayed]
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Subagents Conwidered Harmful by amoss on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @09:11AM (#50453651)
Are we doing typos in headlines now?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Subagents Conwidered Harmful by seanhunter on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @09:38AM (#50453990)
@dang
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Subagents Conwidered Harmful by mrwh on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @10:00AM (#50454272)
What an odd neologism, I thought. Con-widered, what could that mean? I'm a little disappointed all it means is that w is close to s on a keyboard.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Subagents Conwidered Harmful by butterlesstoast on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @10:48AM (#50454802)
That's some 5d chess
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Subagents Conwidered Harmful by simianwords on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @09:29AM (#50453867)
> A fork costs more tokens, but it knows exactly what’s been asked for, what’s been corrected and which approaches have already been thrown out

But a fork is prompt-cache friendly so it might end up costing lesser

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Subagents Conwidered Harmful by gijsbos on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @11:43AM (#50455450)
Isn't the root cause that the summaries aren't accurate enough?
[ Parent | on HN ]