There's always people out there to minimize success of others.

It's not first. It's nothing new. It's not innovative.

There's an old article in WSJ that claimed SpaceX told investors that starlink was profitable if you excluded certain costs. We found out from the IPO that that was nonsense. SpaceX was charging starlink the internal cost of launch. Not the public pricing that everyone else charges.

That makes sense if you're not trying to split the company.

Something that makes no sense.

The launch costs for Starlink DO NOT show up as costs that Starlink pays. They show up as depreciation on the satellites themselves.

So is everything, it's an empty statement.

> Starlink is already showing net income and has shown net income for at least 3 years.

This is just BS since they don't break it out as a separate business. There are accounting rules for this and they don't follow them because they are not treating it as a seperate business.

> There's always people out there to minimize success of others.

Oh poor Musk, everyone is always trying to put him down. If only people would leave him alone he only want to save the world from everything. He's a saint.

Nothing hidden

All hail Saint Nutjob