Starlink is a profitable business segment. The majority of revenue comes from consumers, a minority comes from a combination of enterprise and government customers. Saying it’s subsidized or dependent on golden dome is simply not true.

I think the core issue is that even if the subsidy you are saying got it this far ended, they’ve reached a point where they could keep going without it. So even if what you are saying is true, it’s still wrong.

Your comment history is uniquely obsessive. Like, almost identical to what these accounts have posted (before getting banned):

https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=kidme5

https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=georgeg23

https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=forgot-im-old

https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=infinitewars

Do you have some alert on anyone who posts about Golden Dome?

Honestly you seem very obsessive. What is your stake in this?

Your writing style is obvious. If you copy-and-paste excerpts from your original comment into the search bar at the bottom of the site, it starts pulling up the accounts I named. You all say the same stuff in almost exactly the same way, on the same threads with the same submission history. Even if you wrote differently, it would be trivial to cross-reference your comment history.

My stake is trying to point out ban evaders. Feel free to audit my comment history if you want, it's pretty banal.

Lol Let's see an example of what you're talking about How would a Hacker News ban even work?