Re:A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code
by ianm218 on Tuesday November 10, 2026 @11:29AM
(#50442638)
I have no relation to Pangram... I don't even have an account so I can't do the share link thing. This post smelled like AI so I tested it. It's low quality rage bait that doesn't belong on HN.
Re:A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code
by lelanthran on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @04:45AM
(#50451469)
> And this is the top rated comment, which means many people wont even read the linked. Congrats OP. Your PR strategy worked
I'm constantly surprised that people are fighting vigorously to post AI-generated comments but want to be read by human eyeballs.
Look, if it's that important to you that you post AI-content, there are numerous places that will allow it with no humans reading it at all!
Why is it so important to you that the AI comments have to be consumed by humans?
I mean, why fight for the output of you bot to be read by humans? Why not simply go to those AI-filled places where no human will ever read the output of your bot?
Re:A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code
by shantnutiwari on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @09:34AM
(#50453942)
>Why is it so important to you that the AI comments have to be consumed by humans?
Thanks for showing us an example of the straw man fallacy! Keep them coming!
Yeah because Pangram is like the Bible, we trust it for everything.
Some time ago I noted that "This is aI" was shortcut for "I dont like it and will complain its ai"
This is the new way to do a hit job on someone- no need to argue the points or make intelligent criticism. Just shit "Its AI, panagram mommy said so" and move on.
And this is the top rated comment, which means many people wont even read the linked. Congrats OP. Your PR strategy worked