News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on DeepX claims inference up to 100B parameters at less than 5 W. Parent comment

Re:DeepX claims inference up to 100B parameters at less than... by egberts1 on Monday November 09, 2026 @04:34PM (#50432536)
[delayed]
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:DeepX claims inference up to 100B parameters at less than... by danuker on Monday November 09, 2026 @05:22PM (#50433128)
Back in July, I timed myself manually looking at some data files to create an index out of them, and out of curiosity asked some AI to do the same.

It took me an hour (61 minutes) and I made 4 mistakes in about 80 entries. It took DeepSeek-V4-Flash 3 minutes, it cost $0.034, and only made 2 mistakes. There is no contest. Humans have lost.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:DeepX claims inference up to 100B parameters at less than... by anonymous908213 on Monday November 09, 2026 @05:39PM (#50433292)
Uh, yeah, humans lost at data processing about halfway through the last century. The calculator can calculate fast than you. Great that you've finally discovered what computers can do, but it doesn't mean what you seem to think it means.
[ Parent | on HN ]