Re:Goldman Sachs Is Pulling Claude Code from Its Bankers and...
by arthurcolle on Sunday November 08, 2026 @03:40PM
(#50416960)
Indeed. But if it's a model running on your own hardware it isn't as risky. And the Anthropic models are actually pretty good at kind of writing code that will look at contents of a file without fully looking at the content, so it's insecure but not quite as bad as an open("secrets.txt").read()
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Goldman Sachs Is Pulling Claude Code from Its Bankers and...
by spockz on Sunday November 08, 2026 @04:53PM
(#50417735)
What does that mean? That it only reads part of it into context or RAM?
Re:Goldman Sachs Is Pulling Claude Code from Its Bankers and...
by cedws on Sunday November 08, 2026 @05:19PM
(#50418007)
Local model or not, all LLMs are susceptible to prompt injection and making mistakes (like those cases where you see the agent randomly deleted someone's home dir.) That's what Goldman are likely worried about. Not Anthropic going rogue or something.
Re:Goldman Sachs Is Pulling Claude Code from Its Bankers and...
by heartbreak on Sunday November 08, 2026 @08:50PM
(#50419974)
What does using a local model have to do with it? I’m not worried about the secrets going to Bob, I’m worried about them going to Eve.