News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Goldman Sachs Is Pulling Claude Code from Its Bankers and Traders. Parent comment

Re:Goldman Sachs Is Pulling Claude Code from Its Bankers and... by lukebuehler on Sunday November 08, 2026 @03:32PM (#50416871)
Remote-hosted agents are available in most places. BUT they are not interesting, because they do not have access to all the user's data.

People really want to run agents on their data.

Re sandboxing: I dont know Goldman's particulars, but most enterprises lock down all sandboxing tech on workstations. So I assume this is actually harder than it seems. So people just run it directly on the machine.

The article is referring to the dilemma of the trifecta twice.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Goldman Sachs Is Pulling Claude Code from Its Bankers and... by swores on Sunday November 08, 2026 @05:09PM (#50417912)
What logic led to rules that block sandboxes but allow AI tools like that?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Goldman Sachs Is Pulling Claude Code from Its Bankers and... by verbify on Sunday November 08, 2026 @06:00PM (#50418464)
vt-x is often disabled because there's malware that has exploited it in the past.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Goldman Sachs Is Pulling Claude Code from Its Bankers and... by mickael-kerjean on Sunday November 08, 2026 @07:43PM (#50419482)
> People really want to run agents on their data.

That's exactly the gap I've been working on https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/fdrive you mount your existing data, apply control / permission and can monitor everything the agents are doing with your data

[ Parent | on HN ]