News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I will not be using LLMs in my coding by pleasethinkforo on Sunday November 08, 2026 @09:55AM (#50413852)
When am I (as a user of a lot of software) going to start seeing any results of this unprecedented productivity gain?

This thread is full of 100x supercharged programmers, so why is it that I can't name a single useful feature added in the last 5 years in e.g. macOS, Windows, Firefox, Chrome, YouTube, VS Code, YouTube, Slack, Photoshop, Word or any of the other 5 programs currently on my taskbar?

Re:I will not be using LLMs in my coding by patrakov on Sunday November 08, 2026 @10:25AM (#50414064)
The productivity gain is invisible using your metric.

What I have seen is that, with LLMs, an entire class of process brokenness disappeared in the in-house codebase. Before, there were many trivial tickets that, in the end, required a 5-line bugfix sitting in the queue for months. Now, such tickets are resolved instantly, and the backlog is shrinking.

Re:I will not be using LLMs in my coding by XCSme on Sunday November 08, 2026 @10:39AM (#50414198)
Because the code is and almost never was the problem. Product design and business involves a lot more than code.

Personally, I did see a lot of entry-level products having a lot higher quality and better UX. At the same time, most companies go for fast iterations and are profit-focused, do product quality is not really a target for many.

Re:I will not be using LLMs in my coding by scruple on Sunday November 08, 2026 @01:59PM (#50415971)
The productivity gains will go where they always go when a mature industry undergoes automation. We'll reduce headcount, ramp up the output expectations anyone lucky enough to keep their job, and expand the operating margins for shareholders.

None of this capital has ever been earmarked to build better consumer utilities.