> Only slightly higher than India, lower than Kazakhstan
This India? https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/abs/pii/S1...
One has to have utter lack of intellectual integrity to pretend that there is any comparison in standards between China and India.
> What was the same number for 1949 to 1978?
See the first link I provided.
That is sooooo close to my point but you missed it. High house ownership is not a sign of economic development, quite the opposite.
> See the first link I provided.
You think infant mortality and inflation adjusted incomes are the same number?
That is completely out of touch with reality. Infant mortality fell EVERYWHERE in that period which flatters the numbers.
Now provide the actual number I asked for for the period I asked for. It debunks your argument?
I think that you're an artless troll, and it's frankly pathetic that you think you've debunked something here.
But you keep on doing you, if the clown shoes fit might as well embrace the act.
largely because their living standards had fallen massively in the previous decades. Of course living standards are far higher than they used to be, because of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine
> 90% of families in the country own their home giving China one of the highest home ownership rates in the world.
Only slightly higher than India, lower than Kazakhstan
> The real (inflation-adjusted) incomes of the poorest half of the Chinese population increased by more than four hundred percent from 1978 to 2015,
What was the same number for 1949 to 1978?