Re:Petered (what happens after the Peter Principle)
by aetherspawn on Sunday November 08, 2026 @06:23AM
(#50412321)
The word illegal used a lot, but really, how pervasive is people doing illegal stuff at work? Surely not very.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Petered (what happens after the Peter Principle)
by ba1afd89f34cb23 on Sunday November 08, 2026 @06:31AM
(#50412353)
The word “illegal” appears exactly once, paired with “unethical”. That doesn’t seem to be a major takeaway from the article to me.
Re:Petered (what happens after the Peter Principle)
by Joel_Mckay on Sunday November 08, 2026 @06:46AM
(#50412433)
Usually, all sins are forgiven if a project launches on time.
Often it is board-level folks that have a naive understanding of the problem scope, and ruminate on their bruised ego from the harsh words burned-out staff spew.
There is also silly folks that honestly believe they will figure anything out faster, or can get away with a quick MVP bodge before jumping firms. I would argue they form an ecosystem, that keeps people that clean up messes fully employed. =3
Re:Petered (what happens after the Peter Principle)
by ZnerflBerp on Sunday November 08, 2026 @06:52AM
(#50412473)
There's plenty of stuff that goes on in large organisations which sits in what I would call "minor illegality" i.e. technically illegal, but the sort of thing people are going to pretend not to notice as long as they can have plausible deniability themselves.