I'd much rather stay with Github than a small provider.
Detect it using an algorithm and automatically ban your business account?
Do people not see how insane that policy is?
The world is changing too fast for our laws to adapt. Not to mention for us to adapt.
Swap those two and you're on the right track. I think the best way to use GH is as a mirror for a self-hosted git instance, with or without web frontend. It gives you the reach of GH with the, dare I say it, reliability of self-hosted. It also gives you the chance to keep things off GH which you don't want to be there. Keep the self-hosted instance private for most things, use GH links for public access. When GH is down again you can always give people (temporary) access to your self-hosted instance if the need arrives.
You are probably wrong on that.
> You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools (including services such as Claude, OpenAI Codex). Such projects having an unclear copyright status (see requirements § 2 (1) 1 and § 2 (1) 3) and furthermore have little safeguards to ensure that they do not include harmful code (c.f. § 2 (1) 5).
https://codeberg.org/codeberg/org/src/branch/main/TermsOfUse...
You are probably wrong on that.
Come on man.
Heuristics are never 100%. Even a 0.001% error rate is simply unacceptable to businesses.
I'd rather stay in Github and maybe use another service purely as backup.