News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on I Use Development-Driven Specs, Not Spec-Driven Development.

Re:I Use Development-Driven Specs, Not Spec-Driven Development by ozlikethewizard on Sunday November 08, 2026 @12:02AM (#50410539)
"The book that builds an AI coding agent. The agent that builds the next edition."

Really?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:I Use Development-Driven Specs, Not Spec-Driven Development by syngrog66 on Sunday November 08, 2026 @12:38AM (#50410710)
a collective madness or mass IQ collapse
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:I Use Development-Driven Specs, Not Spec-Driven Development by WaywardGeek on Sunday November 08, 2026 @01:29AM (#50410925)
It isn't IQ collapse. Madness, possibly.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:I Use Development-Driven Specs, Not Spec-Driven Development by crab2 on Sunday November 08, 2026 @05:14AM (#50411924)
based. Please, someone unflag this man's thread.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:I Use Development-Driven Specs, Not Spec-Driven Development by WaywardGeek on Sunday November 08, 2026 @12:54AM (#50410779)
Yes. Simply clone the repo and give it to Astra, Opus, or Falbe. Really.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:I Use Development-Driven Specs, Not Spec-Driven Development by nvme0n1p1 on Sunday November 08, 2026 @01:23AM (#50410898)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_loss
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:I Use Development-Driven Specs, Not Spec-Driven Development by WaywardGeek on Sunday November 08, 2026 @01:28AM (#50410918)
It's real. Each iteration through the loop, is the quality increasing or degenerating?

That's partly why I switched from Go to C# in the 3rd edition (third time executing the book, including the first time when I pair-programed with the AI to created it).

The quality of the codebook is either improving ore degrading. I believe so far, I've managed improving.

[ Parent | on HN ]