News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Asahi Linux Progress Linux 7.3 by palata on Saturday November 07, 2026 @05:04PM (#50408476)
Permissive licences require attribution. They clearly state that there have been cases where their code was published without attribution.

The only thing you ask with a permissive licence is attribution. Why would it not make sense to you that they want it honoured?

Re:Asahi Linux Progress Linux 7.3 by v64 on Saturday November 07, 2026 @07:10PM (#50409295)
Omitted attribution is of course a license violation, but their issues are not limited to just that case, and it's the other issues I'm addressing.
Re:Asahi Linux Progress Linux 7.3 by maleldil on Sunday November 08, 2026 @07:29AM (#50412691)
If they didn't even give attribution, why would we think they'd care about copyleft at all?
Re:Asahi Linux Progress Linux 7.3 by palata on Sunday November 08, 2026 @10:53AM (#50414299)
In the permissive world, nobody cares about attribution. Many people actually don't even know that "permissive" doesn't mean "public domain".

In the copyleft world, people are a lot more vocal. If you abuse a copyleft licence, chances are that some people will make noise :-).