Re:A Jev that can ask Opus for help gives Opus accuracy at 4...
by semi-extrinsic on Saturday November 07, 2026 @10:55AM
(#50405595)
My guy you sound like a bot, stop it.
Re:A Jev that can ask Opus for help gives Opus accuracy at 4...
by guregodevo on Saturday November 07, 2026 @11:31AM
(#50405846)
I wish my bots talk like this. BTW if you have anything relevant to say about Jev i'm listening
If we compare coding agents with Jev on vs off we get those numbers (metered with Memdoor): - read-heavy tasks (coding questions , logs tail etc..): -63% to -65% input tokens, 40-45% fewer model calls, on GLM 5.3 half the wall time. Reproduced a month apart on two models (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GLM 5.3). - a file edit: -23%
Two things match the post. Calibration is what makes it safe: I apply a decision at confidence >= 0.75 and fail below this threshold or on timeout or on an unknown tool family. The dollar saving scales with the price of the model being saved: on a $0.04/M model Jev costs what it saves so on a $0.38/M model it's negligible but on Claude model for example it can be outstanding.
Where it did not help: giving Jev more context about the repo. I found same thing as the post.
If you are interested i have put figures here : https://github.com/guregodevo/memdoor/blob/main/docs/feature...