Re:GitHub's new Git storage architecture
by petervandijck on Saturday November 07, 2026 @04:03AM
(#50402893)
I wonder if they’re working on a non git version forward looking for agents as well
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GitHub's new Git storage architecture
by mpalmer on Saturday November 07, 2026 @09:40AM
(#50404948)
This new brilliant idea that agents need something different/better than git is simply ridiculous.
The problems of scale we're encountering are because bad developers are deploying bad quantities of bad agents against bad repos.
Vibe-coded repos occupy GB of space, utterly useless PRs are opened and closed due to conflicts with other useless PRs, and it turns out git is the problem!
Re:GitHub's new Git storage architecture
by chrisweekly on Saturday November 07, 2026 @10:07AM
(#50405177)
I thought Actions (for free repos) was the main culprit, no?
Re:GitHub's new Git storage architecture
by dbalatero on Saturday November 07, 2026 @10:47AM
(#50405515)
You're not wrong, but GitHub can only control what they can control. They cannot hold everyone at gun point and make them stop vibe coding. They also cannot shutdown Anthropic/OpenAI - you'll have to wait for their A/OAI's debts to come due for that one.
Re:GitHub's new Git storage architecture
by judge2020 on Saturday November 07, 2026 @12:13PM
(#50406171)
We might see real usage limits come to GH's free plan. TBH, I bet they're regretting their decision to allow unlimited private repos on the free plan, at least a bit.
Re:GitHub's new Git storage architecture
by SweetSoftPillow on Saturday November 07, 2026 @12:23PM
(#50406257)
Afaik all their problems are caused by public repos, private are not that expensive.
Re:GitHub's new Git storage architecture
by necovek on Saturday November 07, 2026 @03:22PM
(#50407705)
I think humans need something better than git :)
Once they get it, agents will get it too! Eg. I'd switch over to bazaar/breezy with comparable performance to git — but mostly comparable adoption — right away.