Re:Tesla winds down Cybertruck production after years of poo...
by qlte on Friday November 06, 2026 @12:22PM
(#50395338)
You yourself might want to do a quick Google search or AI chat and see:
Musk says SpaceX did restrict Starlink, as Ukraine says the tech has been restored
> In a post on social media site X, Musk said that Ukraine had been violating Starlink's terms of service by using it for offensive military activity.
https://www.npr.org/2026/10/24/nx-s1-6015482/ukraine-starlin...
Re:Tesla winds down Cybertruck production after years of poo...
by drak0n1c on Friday November 06, 2026 @05:35PM
(#50399411)
I don't see how that refutes the points of the above comment. What you posted is logically consistent with it. Deductively, it's possible that Starshield, fully controlled by US Gov and given to Ukraine by US Gov was temporarily limited/revoked by US Gov due to some potentially geopolitical-escalation-relevant tactic disagreement, and concurrently or as a fallback Ukraine surreptitiously used civilian Starlinks for offensive military activity and that part was then understandably stopped because of Starlink ToS enforcement.
There is no conclusive proof of the Starshield access side being manipulated by SpaceX.
You are deeply, utterly misinformed and loudly ignorant.
Ukraine uses StarShield, which is owned/operated by the USGov. Starlink is a civilian service not for military use.
If you can't be bothered to perform a simple google search to educate yourself about basic matters such as this in a few seconds, why should anyone listen to any of your other (ridiculous) points?