Re:I struggle to believe that AI R&D is ingenious
by QuesnayJr on Friday November 06, 2026 @08:08AM
(#50391897)
Other than for maybe Navier-Stokes, they just didn't brute force it in the way you guys are thinking. Most unsolved math problems are not susceptible to brute force, which is why the problems remained unsolved. AI is so quick it can of course try more ideas than a person, but each idea is executed at genius IQ level. Even if you knew the broad outlines of the proof of quasi-Riemann, there are probably only 20 people in the world who could have executed it.
Re:I struggle to believe that AI R&D is ingenious
by jasomill on Friday November 06, 2026 @11:45PM
(#50401696)
This is trivially true for any theorem with a proof that can be automatically verified in finite time, but does not preclude the universe lacking a suitable combination of monkeys, typewriters, and time to do so.
It’s kinda like the project where someone generated a lot of midi files for all possible pop riffs to copyright them. If you have a start and endpoint, rules for navigation, and unlimited computes, you can brute force anything. The nice stuff is when you made exploration efficient.