News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Inkling 2 Small by Neywiny on Thursday November 05, 2026 @08:51PM (#50387154)
I feel like this is a dumb question, but why are we spending any effort on wine comparisons? Is there a way to get rid of experts on these to just be ones for code?
Re:Inkling 2 Small by kccqzy on Thursday November 05, 2026 @09:00PM (#50387213)
What if your coding project is related to wine? So you would want facts about wine to be inside the weights, not through web search.
Re:Inkling 2 Small by Neywiny on Thursday November 05, 2026 @09:22PM (#50387342)
If it was about wine, why would I want one with a training data cutoff? I'd much rather have one that can query a database about wine
Re:Inkling 2 Small by randomblock1 on Thursday November 05, 2026 @09:37PM (#50387466)
It's not like they're training on that. That's just a good showcase of how the model is good at generalizing & understanding (not benchmaxxed). You might want something similar to these experts for tasks like detecting anomalies or discoloration or whatever.
Re:Inkling 2 Small by Neywiny on Thursday November 05, 2026 @09:49PM (#50387542)
Source they didn't train on it?
Re:Inkling 2 Small by XenophileJKO on Thursday November 05, 2026 @10:58PM (#50387987)
Just looking through the benchmarks, the model seems to be very high on visual/spatial capabilities. So I assumed they just tried some hard tasks on it and was surprised by wine identification and thought it was surprising that it could identify wines.
Re:Inkling 2 Small by zild3d on Friday November 06, 2026 @06:15AM (#50390942)
you want your coding models to have good taste, so we have fed them a vast dataset of sommelier wine gradings.

we've also contracted hundreds of local record store guys with deeply knowledgeable music taste spanning post-punk, classic jazz, early hip-hop, and deep-cut experimental vinyl. This has resulted in the model returning judgmental responses up to 23% more often which we are working on addressing.