News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MS Paint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability by gruez on Thursday November 05, 2026 @08:26PM (#50387002)
>I can't come with a reason why "An unauthenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted packet to an affected service over the network."

The Microsoft link doesn't mention this at all, so my guess it's "remote" in the sense that a zip file exploit is "remote"

Re:MS Paint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability by doubled112 on Thursday November 05, 2026 @09:02PM (#50387224)
Put it on a file share and now any file is "remote".
Re:MS Paint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability by jdiff on Thursday November 05, 2026 @10:07PM (#50387672)
Remote, and inapplicable. One of the very few things the Microsoft link does mention that no user interaction is required. A banana left out in the walkway still requires the user to go for a walk.
Re:MS Paint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability by dofm on Friday November 06, 2026 @12:22AM (#50388532)
> A banana left out in the walkway still requires the user to go for a walk.

This is some Eric-Cantona-level gnomic mysticism. I approve.

Re:MS Paint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability by simiones on Friday November 06, 2026 @10:59AM (#50394019)
It absolutely does, in the "FAQ" section:

https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-20...

> How could an attacker exploit this vulnerability?

> An unauthenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted packet to an affected service over the network. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to execute code on the target system. No authentication or user interaction is required..

Re:MS Paint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability by jasomill on Friday November 06, 2026 @03:47PM (#50398296)
Paint now has Copilot features that require sign-in, so presumably involve network access.