News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Goodbye from Salon by coldtea on Thursday November 05, 2026 @07:12PM (#50386442)
>The vast majority of what was lost were "beat" reporters - foreign bureaus, Washington bureaus from regional publications, statehouse reporters, or regional specialty beats (science, law, etc).

People doing actual useful news work, in other terms.

Re:Goodbye from Salon by rdiddly on Thursday November 05, 2026 @10:19PM (#50387756)
"The vast majority of what was lost were journalists." Fixed it for both of you!

(I'm joking, but then again, if demagogues can remove specifics to make statements punchier, why can't I?)

Re:Goodbye from Salon by PaulDavisThe1st on Thursday November 05, 2026 @10:19PM (#50387759)
I wish would stop using "journalist" and "reporter" interchangeably.

Reporters are people who actually get out into the world, collect facts, collect opinions from real people (some of them experts at something, some of them not), try to actually see "newsworthy events" in person.

Journalists write essays based on the work reporters do.

I'm not saying I want less journalists, but I do want more reporters.

Re:Goodbye from Salon by jameshart on Thursday November 05, 2026 @10:30PM (#50387815)
You might be thinking of ‘columnists’?
Re:Goodbye from Salon by epcoa on Thursday November 05, 2026 @10:50PM (#50387920)
Disagree, it’d be more accurate to say reporters are a subset of journalists. Reporters are journalists, journalists is just more general.
Re:Goodbye from Salon by bluebarbet on Friday November 06, 2026 @05:35AM (#50390637)
The profession is journalism. Reporting is a form of journalism. Non-reporter journalists are not just pundits who pontificate. Analysis (based on someone else's reporting) is a form of journalism. Editing and sub-editing are forms of journalism.