Re:Introducing Pangram Image 1.0
by my002 on Thursday November 05, 2026 @04:47PM
(#50384922)
People often shit on AI detectors but Pangram's text AI detection has been very good, IME. Not perfect, but good enough to be useful in most circumstances.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Introducing Pangram Image 1.0
by jszymborski on Thursday November 05, 2026 @07:20PM
(#50386505)
My trouble with Pangram is that the calibration is totally off. It can tell you if there is a drop or an ocean of AI in the text you submit. The "X% of AI" message doesn't really mean much. You can test this yourself: Slowly add generated text to a human write paragraph and you'll see it hit "100% AI" quite quickly.
Good?
Re:Introducing Pangram Image 1.0
by Matticus_Rex on Thursday November 05, 2026 @07:58PM
(#50386821)
It analyzes in segments, and the percentage is of the segments, not of the words.
Re:Introducing Pangram Image 1.0
by jszymborski on Thursday November 05, 2026 @10:49PM
(#50387915)
Yes but the segment sizes are huge and any amount of LLm generated sequences within that block cause all of it to be flagged as AI.
Re:Introducing Pangram Image 1.0
by Matticus_Rex on Saturday November 07, 2026 @01:54AM
(#50402277)
That's the state of the tech right now. It'll be nice if we can get it and keep it more granular than that, but even at the current state it's pretty impressive.
[delayed]
Because it isn't an "X% chance". It's an "X% of words".