News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Vivaldi 8.3 for Desktop: make bad ads sad by GrantMoyer on Thursday November 05, 2026 @10:25AM (#50380267)
The problem is that the choice isn't seeing ads v.s. paying for the content. Instead, the choice is seeing ads v.s. overpaying for the content, then seeing ads anyway when the service decides to indrosuce ads back to the paid subscription. By overpaying, I mean compared to what the service itself values it content at when it serves it for free with ads.

How many people would sign up for a 15$ per month subscription to read one article with no ads? How many would pay 1¢ once to read the article with no ads? How many would sign up for one 15$ per month subscription to see no ads anywhere?

Re:Vivaldi 8.3 for Desktop: make bad ads sad by andyfilms1 on Thursday November 05, 2026 @11:26AM (#50381103)
ISPs have their own DNS servers they could use to those block ads, ie. a network-wide Pihole. Paying the Spotify for Adblock fee could get you access to the "premium" DNS servers.

It would still be an arms race, but I'm just spitballing here.