News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing Images 2.6 by spi on Thursday November 05, 2026 @09:40AM (#50379659)
Well I doubt that :-) the image tokens can just be added as further tokens, so one wouldn't even need a dedicated output head. E.g. Emu architecture [1] does text, image, and videos all together. So definitely not new. That's not even a separate head, everything stays together.

Regarding whether that's standard to pre-train multi-modal LLM, apparently that is not the case (at least, according to ChatGPT's answer, but that's reasonable - or anyway it was only a wild guess on my side). Apparently it's more common to have a text-only and an image-only pretraining phases, followed by an alignment to make the two embedding spaces a common one.

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.18869

Re:Introducing Images 2.6 by armcat on Thursday November 05, 2026 @06:16PM (#50385927)
Well, you can doubt all you like, that’s irrelevant here.

Why do you think next token prediction didn’t take off in multi modal space? That’s right! Because it’s prohibitively slow. A diffusion model, by contrast, can update an entire latent image in parallel at each denoising step. Imagine decoding images or a 10 second video one token/pixel at a time! Secondly, images are not naturally sequential. They are spatial representations of information m. Diffusion can progressively refine both local and global spatial structures in the image.

I actually think there is room for next token multi modal prediction but more where world models are concerned. Like predicting the next set of futures for a robot. But actually now I would opt for decision models instead.

But in short, your analysis, and doubts, are incorrect as to why generalist LLMs are not used instead of bespoke diffusion image gen models.