News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Awesome repositories are no longer awesome by bemtevi on Thursday November 05, 2026 @06:48AM (#50378032)
I found a few lists that I found genuinely useful, like self-hosted. But I also think the problem with them is they were gamed for some reason, maybe because of Github stars and the fact that Github attention is useful for other things. I think it would have been much more useful to have them almost on a different platform. IMBD lists for example seem to work better because there's not much reward in making them except a love of movies.

Also I think another problem is that they were given high recognition on Github, and thus became a formulaic pattern rather that some individual who is really passionate about trying the stuff on the list, which also made most of the later ones generic and much less interesting...

Re:Awesome repositories are no longer awesome by PaulKeeble on Thursday November 05, 2026 @07:48AM (#50378471)
Curation is also really hard to go as a group activity, there are so many different views on value and rules just don't work for taste in any way that works.
Re:Awesome repositories are no longer awesome by embedding-shape on Thursday November 05, 2026 @10:15AM (#50380146)
> Curation is also really hard to go as a group activity

It really isn't. You establish a process, a review system and the guidelines, then make people write and share notes. It'll be a bit varied initially, but it solidifies and converges a lot quicker than you think.

There are hundreds of examples out in the world of all of these things working properly, everything from galleries to second-hand stores have things like this "implemented" already, take inspiration from them :)

Re:Awesome repositories are no longer awesome by well_ackshually on Thursday November 05, 2026 @10:17AM (#50380175)
awesome-selfhosted maintainers do work quite hard to reject slop, non-notable software, etc.