Re:Awesome repositories are no longer awesome
by PaulKeeble on Thursday November 05, 2026 @07:48AM
(#50378471)
Curation is also really hard to go as a group activity, there are so many different views on value and rules just don't work for taste in any way that works.
Re:Awesome repositories are no longer awesome
by embedding-shape on Thursday November 05, 2026 @10:15AM
(#50380146)
> Curation is also really hard to go as a group activity
It really isn't. You establish a process, a review system and the guidelines, then make people write and share notes. It'll be a bit varied initially, but it solidifies and converges a lot quicker than you think.
There are hundreds of examples out in the world of all of these things working properly, everything from galleries to second-hand stores have things like this "implemented" already, take inspiration from them :)
Re:Awesome repositories are no longer awesome
by well_ackshually on Thursday November 05, 2026 @10:17AM
(#50380175)
awesome-selfhosted maintainers do work quite hard to reject slop, non-notable software, etc.
Also I think another problem is that they were given high recognition on Github, and thus became a formulaic pattern rather that some individual who is really passionate about trying the stuff on the list, which also made most of the later ones generic and much less interesting...