Re:Kitty 0.50
by ghosty141 on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @02:30PM
(#50370401)
> I suspect the reason some of Kitty's standardized features are being independently adopted by other terminal emulators is because they are genuinely useful.
Correct, kitty-keyboard-protocol or kitty-image-protocol are actually useful and thats why Ghostty for example supports them. The alternatives are often worse or only have niche benefits (looking at you sixels)
Correct, kitty-keyboard-protocol or kitty-image-protocol are actually useful and thats why Ghostty for example supports them. The alternatives are often worse or only have niche benefits (looking at you sixels)