News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Kitty 0.50. Parent comment

Re:Kitty 0.50 by jemmyw on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @07:11AM (#50364502)
Not OP either but I moved back to kitty after giving ghostty a try. Kitty is pretty mature and it has tons of features. I don't use them all by any means, but enough that I missed them. It has all those features yet it feels so barebones: kitty is a delight.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kitty 0.50 by kkukshtel on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @01:08PM (#50369309)
What features?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kitty 0.50 by mcbuilder on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @01:56PM (#50369968)
I just wanna say, it's okay to prefer different terminals, like there were so many back in the day. people's dev flows become hyper specific, depending on what tools, editors, features they need... I used to use `st` back in the day, but also `urxvt` and the classic `xterm`, or `guake` for adventurous. One of my absolute favs is https://github.com/uobikiemukot/yaft which was fun to rock on classic Thinkpad T62p laptops without any X11.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kitty 0.50 by mtswish on Thursday November 05, 2026 @10:52AM (#50380673)
It is fine, it is also fine to inquire which exact features they are looking for.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kitty 0.50 by ossusermivami on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @05:04PM (#50372179)
maybe compare both documentation and make urself an idea? it's all there
[ Parent | on HN ]