US boy names that became girl names and vice versa

Re:US boy names that became girl names and vice versa by jltsiren on Monday November 02, 2026 @05:23PM (#50344794)

She didn't get the suffix until her 20s. And it was not used to distinguish her from her mother (who was also a Queen Elizabeth) but from yet another Elizabeth who lived centuries earlier.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US boy names that became girl names and vice versa by unpleasurable on Monday November 02, 2026 @11:19PM (#50348014)

Elizabeth II was the first Elizabeth who was Queen of UK

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US boy names that became girl names and vice versa by bregma on Tuesday November 03, 2026 @06:14AM (#50350551)

Same with the current king Charles III of England. He is the first of that name to be king of the UK (and Canada, Australia, etc). Maybe people should revert to multiple ordinals, like James VI and I in 1603.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US boy names that became girl names and vice versa by psd1 on Tuesday November 03, 2026 @07:50AM (#50351400)

I don't think that's right - well, Canada and Australia ofc. The "U" in "UK" refers to James IV of Scotland becoming James of England, thus uniting the states of Albion. Charles succeeded him.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US boy names that became girl names and vice versa by jcranmer on Tuesday November 03, 2026 @09:08AM (#50352189)

Scotland and England were not united into a single Kingdom of Great Britain until 1707 (under Queen Anne), and it did not become the United Kingdom (of Great Britain and Ireland) until 1800 (under George III). So technically the "U" actually refers to union of Britain and Ireland, not England and Scotland.

Before the Acts of Union of 1707, England and Scotland were not united into one kingdom, but two kingdoms that shared the same king under a personal union.

[ Parent | on HN ]