Re:Show HN: Subvocal – Talk to your computer without making ...
by paisawalla on Monday November 02, 2026 @12:33PM
(#50340370)
How have the glasses been received? I don't understand why they're required, is it only to have a consistent mount point for the radar sensor, relative to the face? Have you thought about a throat mic?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Subvocal – Talk to your computer without making ...
by kennywinker on Monday November 02, 2026 @12:53PM
(#50340714)
It looked like there was a throat mic in the first shot... it seems counterintuitive that you'd get better performance out of lidar on face muscles than on a throat mic.
Re:Show HN: Subvocal – Talk to your computer without making ...
by aarushyadav on Monday November 02, 2026 @01:18PM
(#50341122)
No throat mic, the first image uses EMG (muscle electrical signal) sensors. A throat mic only works if you're still actually whispering (not fully silent) and is also a weird form factor for a consumer device, which is why we didn't go with it!
Re:Show HN: Subvocal – Talk to your computer without making ...
by paisawalla on Monday November 02, 2026 @02:22PM
(#50342184)
I'll defer to your expertise on what people find weird, but it seems like you should be able to have a throat-based device that could hide under a shirt collar. I have the Meta Ray Bans and even though I love the functionality, I don't care for the bulky frames. And those are designed by Ray Ban, meaning they're presumably at the upper end of what can be done stylishly.
Re:Show HN: Subvocal – Talk to your computer without making ...
by kennywinker on Monday November 02, 2026 @04:41PM
(#50344216)
> Meta Ray Bans and even though I love the functionality
Which functionality do you love? Is it the nonconsensual recording? Or maybe the giving away your own privacy and the privacy of everyone around you to one of history's least-trustworthy companies?