News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The future in old computer magazines (1984–2004) by mapontosevenths on Monday November 02, 2026 @07:57AM (#50336205)
Sometimes I fear that the vastly wealthy will only remember the social contracts that allowed them to become wealthy are two way contracts after the first few have been eaten.

They mistake the temporary shape of today's society for some unstoppable force of nature, and imagine their success to be proof of superiority. I hope they realize that neither are true before people become truly desperate.

Re:The future in old computer magazines (1984–2004) by BizarroLand on Monday November 02, 2026 @12:55PM (#50340733)
I'm pretty sure the reason why the modern world sucks so much is that it is built on an endless maze of distraction machines.

We argue of politics, over why someone's opinion on the other side of the planet is wrong. We gawk at celebrities with terrible personalities and surgically or digitally amplified talent. We spend billions on bad movies with terrible plots that never correlate to or make us think about our own lives. We envision ourselves wealthy and beloved and poised to be greater than the greatest of all time, and we do this all while constantly being driven to work harder, output more, find new ways to make money so that we might have more for ourselves, never really considering how much we make for others and how much we are being completely and totally used until we are wrung dry and discarded by the very world we gave everything to.

We all think a small life is worthless, when it's the only thing we have.

Re:The future in old computer magazines (1984–2004) by pixl97 on Monday November 02, 2026 @01:15PM (#50341084)
In the past a small life was your only option.

The modern connected world drags you into a much bigger life than our monkey brains can handle.

And just ignoring shit doesn't fix the problem either.

It's a mess.

Re:The future in old computer magazines (1984–2004) by pixl97 on Monday November 02, 2026 @01:13PM (#50341054)
>after the first few have been eaten.

This is a bit more difficult in the modern world. If a Chinese CEO, for example, is ruining the world he's going to be very difficult for me to eat.

Also with a modern governments ability to monitor all your actions it may be very difficult to rise up without getting noticed and disappeared almost instantly. "The USSR brought to you by Flock".

Re:The future in old computer magazines (1984–2004) by 10111001 on Monday November 02, 2026 @02:41PM (#50342515)
> Sometimes I fear that the vastly wealthy will only remember the social contracts that allowed them to become wealthy are two way contracts after the first few have been eaten.

The only social contract the vastly wealthy will remember is that the plebs must respect their private property rights as a divine right, in return they'll give the plebs the opportunity to work...sometimes.