It seems you never built an intelligent one!
Most algo's, especially ones made as a 'side project', are actually just directional bets and not true algorithms. And there are cheaper ways to take directional bets thus most of these are actually losing money - if the author just understood their directional bet, they could buy relevant stock/options to have the same risk profile for cheaper. But compiling algorithms back down into their directional components is an entire field in quant finance, akin to something like DS&A for CS.
Which is the joke I was referencing. When you take a directional bet and win, that isn't proof you're algorithm 'worked', it proves your directional bet won. Akin to someone who "vibe codes a website" and then sends you a localhost url. It's proof you're just making shit up and not aware of what it is you're building or how it works.
And now finalizing an open source development harness that I hope will be successful and will drive consulting business in AI. Check www.nomorehappypath.com