News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Retired professor arrested for blocking delivery robot. W... by ryandrake on Saturday October 31, 2026 @11:24AM (#50317008)
But she was not obstructing the right of way. Presumably people could move around her. It's not illegal to stand on the sidewalk. It's possible they might try to stretch (IMO bogus) "loitering" laws to get her, but doing so would make their intentions crystal clear.
Re:Retired professor arrested for blocking delivery robot. W... by handoflixue on Saturday October 31, 2026 @11:29AM (#50317063)
As an analogy, consider doing this to a person and trying that same excuse.

I suppose if the robot literally cannot path around someone standing still, it might be a valid excuse? But as soon as you're actively moving to block it, it is obviously obstruction.

Judges get to run off common sense, not programmer logic - the point of the law is that public paths ought to be usable by anyone for lawful purposes, and currently "delivery robot" is a lawful purpose.

Re:Retired professor arrested for blocking delivery robot. W... by reaperducer on Saturday October 31, 2026 @09:37PM (#50321977)
As an analogy, consider doing this to a person and trying that same excuse.

Why? A robot is not a person. It is a robot.

Unless the delivery robot has a legal permit to conduct its commercial business in the public space that is the sidewalk, then there is no reason that a human being should care about it.

Just like when businesses put up bandit signs in the median. People have the legal right to remove them because the signs are not there legally.

I have seen nothing that indicates these robots have any special-use permits for the sidewalk the way, say, a street vendor would.

Re:Retired professor arrested for blocking delivery robot. W... by handoflixue on Sunday November 01, 2026 @04:45AM (#50324007)
Sorry, what law specifies obstruction only applies to "people" or something with a special permit? Where are you seeing the requirement for them to have a special-use permit?

Maybe I'm unfamiliar with the local law, but it sounds like you're just making stuff up, since you're not citing any specific code here.

Re:Retired professor arrested for blocking delivery robot. W... by jasomill on Sunday November 01, 2026 @09:26AM (#50326013)
The specific code[1] applies to obstructing "pedestrians", which Pennsylvania state law[2] defines to include "personal delivery devices",

A ground delivery device that:

(1) is manufactured for transporting cargo or goods;

(2) is operated by a driving system that allows remote or autonomous operation, or both; and

(3) weighs 550 pounds or less without cargo or goods.

IANAL, but this certainly sounds like it applies to this case.

[1] https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/philadelphia/latest/ph...

[2] https://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/LI/CT/HTM/75/00.001.00...

Re:Retired professor arrested for blocking delivery robot. W... by throwitaway222 on Saturday October 31, 2026 @11:28AM (#50317056)
> Presumably people could move around her

But if she was doing the same thing to humans as she was to the robot, they couldn't move around her (assuming that means re-positioning herself every time they try to go around) - and I think most people would agree that arresting her would be a good thing.

So the next question is, are all users of the sidewalk (as long as they're using it roughly the same way, which is temporary and quick pass through) deserve to have the same rights as a human?

My previous comment doesn't seem to align with this one, but mostly because I'm mixed on this.

Re:Retired professor arrested for blocking delivery robot. W... by sigmar on Saturday October 31, 2026 @11:43AM (#50317209)
>It's possible they might try to stretch (IMO bogus) "loitering" laws to get her, but doing so would make their intentions crystal clear.

If I stand on a train track, do you think the police aren't allowed to ask me to move?

Re:Retired professor arrested for blocking delivery robot. W... by asdfasgasdgasdg on Saturday October 31, 2026 @11:26AM (#50317038)
At least in my state it doesn’t matter if people can go around you. If you’re there to intentionally obstruct human or vehicle traffic on a sidewalk, you are guilty of disorderly conduct. Doesn’t matter whether you’re standing still, moving, blocking the whole sidewalk or just part of it. What matters is your state of mind and purpose.
Re:Retired professor arrested for blocking delivery robot. W... by conartist6 on Saturday October 31, 2026 @11:38AM (#50317151)
Just out of curiosity, can anyone report on how the robots act in terms of right of way? Lets say the sidewalk narrows around an obstacle like a tree or trash can or lime scooter or whatever. If the robot approaches the constriction at the same time as an elderly pedestrian, how does it behave? Will it pause instead of entering? Will it back up a bit when a human would do so to be polite? Will it crowd in someone walking with a cane? In short, what are these things like to be around?
Re:Retired professor arrested for blocking delivery robot. W... by asdfasgasdgasdg on Saturday October 31, 2026 @11:43AM (#50317211)
Presumably it depends on the exact model and when the encounter took place, since I’m sure the devs are constantly working on behavior.
Re:Retired professor arrested for blocking delivery robot. W... by rpdillon on Saturday October 31, 2026 @01:22PM (#50318068)
She was explicitly repositioning herself to stay in the way of the robot and prevent it from making forward progress despite its efforts to move around her. She's not just standing there.