News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Spain train crash: What we know after two trains crashed ... by lxgr on Thursday October 29, 2026 @07:34PM (#50297765)
Why would you need that many? Trains can keep pretty reasonable track of the distance between two balises using odometers.

There are also other solutions, e.g. LZB uses a phase change of the signal every 100 meters as an additional precision signal.

Re:Spain train crash: What we know after two trains crashed ... by 1718627440 on Thursday October 29, 2026 @07:44PM (#50297869)
Because balises cost money, are payed for by infrastructure companies. Their position needs to be decided a priori, so you can't have the whole resolution on the whole network in order to get as close to the physical limits between trains as possible. Also it would be nice to be able to implement automatic shunting without additional infrastructure costs.
Re:Spain train crash: What we know after two trains crashed ... by djankauskas on Friday October 30, 2026 @02:21AM (#50300442)
There are now hybrid systems for ETCS L2 that allow virtual blocks as short as 1 meter long. Balis + odometer is quite robust (and indeed how most CBTC systems with moving block tech function).