News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Static reasoning can't prove runtime behavior: benchmark of AI PR reviewers. Parent comment

Re:Static reasoning can't prove runtime behavior: benchmark ... by batikha on Tuesday October 27, 2026 @10:19AM (#50259805)
Good question. So far our users find value in having everything running smoothly with very low false positive and a continuously improving product.

(we are free during beta, then will charge at token cost for startups and small teams)

As for all products being replaced by labs / SaaSpocalypse: who knows? I think there's always value in making things extremely easy to use and token-efficient.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Static reasoning can't prove runtime behavior: benchmark ... by verdverm on Tuesday October 27, 2026 @11:03AM (#50260451)
The thing is, Ai makes it easier to write a homegrown, custom alternative.

Its a real pain to deal with vendors, legal requirements, and feature requests. Vendors have to optimize for their average user, homegrown can be optimized for one.

[ Parent | on HN ]