News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Corgi, a helpful {agent, terminal} multiplexer by mikemcquaid on Saturday October 24, 2026 @02:24AM (#50218762)
Homebrew is heavily sandboxed and has been using the macOS sandbox for the best part of a decade, long before many other package managers did.

We also offer a .pkg installer and other installation options so curl | bash not needed for install that either.

Re:Show HN: Corgi, a helpful {agent, terminal} multiplexer by eiopa on Saturday October 24, 2026 @02:41AM (#50218812)
TIL! Thank you :)

I’ll take a look then, as I am unsure how sandboxing will interact with this system since it does a few unusual things

Re:Show HN: Corgi, a helpful {agent, terminal} multiplexer by eiopa on Saturday October 24, 2026 @12:34PM (#50222874)
ok I read up on the sandbox. IIUC, this applies to the installer/formula part. The app itself is still unsandboxed.

I can see that it closes one vector of attack (attacking the install script serving), but beyond that the user still runs the binary outside a sandbox.

I feel that the binaries themselves, both directly and indirectly (supply chain attack) are the elephant in the room.

Any thoughts on that? I always wished the cli stuff I install from Homebrew was locked down by default, but it's not practical with today's computer systems since it kills usability.

Anyway, big fan of Homebrew. Looks like I can't submit a formula to core until I get more traction on GitHub (stars/forks/watchers). Otherwise I have to go to taps which takes away a lot of the benefits of being on homebrew-core iiuc.

Re:Show HN: Corgi, a helpful {agent, terminal} multiplexer by mikemcquaid on Friday November 06, 2026 @03:39PM (#50398174)
Run everything you don’t trust, particularly agents, in a non-admin user account under a sandbox. Check out sandvault for some great CLI for this.