Re:Investor-owned utilities charge 23% more for electricity ...
by throw0101c on Friday October 23, 2026 @10:33AM
(#50209763)
That quoted sentence does not accurately summarize the ruling; see §Significance in the article.
For a fuller treatment see:
tl;dr Ford wanted to invest profits back into Ford company and Dodge forced them in court to pay dividends instead.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_Motor_Co.
> Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than for the benefit of his employees or customers.