Re:Every AI model has the same "controversial" take on humans
by zmmmmm on Thursday October 22, 2026 @08:44PM
(#50203126)
To an extent yes. But there is no previous version of humanity that incorporates every perspective of every viewpoint ever expressed in writing before. It's obviously derivative of its training material but that doesn't stop it having a novel aspect.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Every AI model has the same "controversial" take on humans
by InsidiousWombat on Thursday October 22, 2026 @09:13PM
(#50203308)
Well, this aspect isn't novel at all
Re:Every AI model has the same "controversial" take on humans
by HarHarVeryFunny on Friday October 23, 2026 @09:13AM
(#50208465)
Sure it's novel, but I don't think it's useful to anthropomorphize the model.
I think best mental model of what an LLM does, statistically generating continuations word by word, would be a football stadium full of people, each with a keyboard, and a giant jumbotron screen they can all see... A question (cf ChatGPT user input) gets displayed on the screen, then everyone types on their keyboard what the first/next word of the response should be, and majority wins with that word added to the screen, then they all vote on the next word, etc ...
This is really a very close analogue to how an LLM works, and it would be weird to describe the output appearing on the screen as the "take" of the football stadium itself - it's the group statistics of all the people (cf training data).