News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The recently proposed o(n log n) integer multiplication a... by black_knight on Thursday October 22, 2026 @05:20AM (#50193104)
All models still gets things wrong. Even Fable 5.1 I have to regularly correct when working on sufficiently complex code. So, I still want models to get smarter!

Fable is good, especially at conceptual stuff, don’t get me wrong, but it has limits. Opus 5.5 is a machine at getting correct code out once the concepts are in place. But I can’t trust either to not make mistakes.

Re:The recently proposed o(n log n) integer multiplication a... by layer8 on Thursday October 22, 2026 @08:28AM (#50194393)
As an aside, getting things wrong isn’t simply about not being smart enough, it’s also about the model insufficiently assessing whether it actually knows enough to conclude that some hypothesis is correct. As a human I have inner feelings of certainty and uncertainty regarding the things I am thinking about, which guide me in what I need to ascertain or verify more closely. My impression is that LLMs are lacking in that area, and it’s why they are most effective when there are external verification mechanisms.