News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Epic vs. Apple AU:Court Orders Alt App Stores,Sideloading... by Telaneo on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @11:56PM (#50191007)
Surely it's possible to treat phones the same way as computers in corporate settings? Normal users aren't usually allowed to install whatever they want on their work PC, so why their work phone?
Re:Epic vs. Apple AU:Court Orders Alt App Stores,Sideloading... by bunderbunder on Thursday October 22, 2026 @12:10AM (#50191081)
I think they were talking about bring your own device.
Re:Epic vs. Apple AU:Court Orders Alt App Stores,Sideloading... by Telaneo on Thursday October 22, 2026 @12:13AM (#50191092)
How many people bring their own laptop to work? (ignoring self-employed people and the like which this line of thinking really doesn't apply to) Phones should be treated the same way.

Personal devices shouldn't be used for work purposes to begin with. If work has security requirements regarding what phone and what condition it is in, they better be supplying their own phone to ensure those requirements are satisfied.

Re:Epic vs. Apple AU:Court Orders Alt App Stores,Sideloading... by _thisdot on Thursday October 22, 2026 @12:30AM (#50191190)
Vast majority of the people don't have the need for a separate work phone. But they benefit from accessing their work email, Teams chat, calendar, etc. from their phones.
Re:Epic vs. Apple AU:Court Orders Alt App Stores,Sideloading... by Telaneo on Thursday October 22, 2026 @12:32AM (#50191205)
If work wants to be picky about what devices can access those things, but still want their employees to do so, they should provide devices for that. If they don't, well, then the employees get to not do work during non-work hours.
Re:Epic vs. Apple AU:Court Orders Alt App Stores,Sideloading... by nazgu1 on Thursday October 22, 2026 @12:58AM (#50191346)
> But they benefit from accessing their work email, Teams chat, calendar, etc. from their phones.

No, they don't benefit (cause it means they check work mail on weekends or evenings), but their employer do...