Re:What I Expect From a Programming Language
by jfb on Sunday January 06, 2013 @10:13PM
(#5019072)
But the overall calculus, in terms of, say, "productivity" (which is the hand-waviest of hand-waveries) is going to zero out. Or at least, that's my contention, based on these facts (∅) and twenty years of opinion and anecdote.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What I Expect From a Programming Language
by jacques_chester on Sunday January 06, 2013 @10:32PM
(#5019120)
The problem is that the hand-waving could conceal a lot of useful variables -- and different people will care about different variables.
So one variable might be "time to customer value", and dynamic languages have been steadily dominating this space. But another variable might be "lifetime cost of defects" and static languages might come out in front by simply precluding many classes of defect.
And just like that we're back to trading off the long term and short term.