Re:Ask HN: Macbook Air + Remote Server = Macbook Pro?
by fHbjKlf6 on Sunday January 06, 2013 @09:10AM
(#5016337)
Thanks, I don't do any gaming but I would like the ability for multiple monitors. This article suggest that the latest 2012 models do support 2 external displays - http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/06/new-macbooks-can-manage...
Re:Ask HN: Macbook Air + Remote Server = Macbook Pro?
by nytheus on Sunday January 06, 2013 @09:20AM
(#5016353)
I didn't know the 2012 models support multiple monitors. Since that's the case and you do not want to game it's a no brainer.
8GB of ram + SSD will get you far!
Re:Ask HN: Macbook Air + Remote Server = Macbook Pro?
by dfamorato on Sunday January 06, 2013 @11:41AM
(#5016735)
My Retina Macbook Pro 13" is my main machine and I connect 2 27" Viewsonic monitors to it daily. It works just fine for everyday work (iterm, vim, intellij, rdp and office apps)
If only it had 16GB (not available on the 13" rMBP model), it would be the perfect laptop
Re:Ask HN: Macbook Air + Remote Server = Macbook Pro?
by bjustin on Sunday January 06, 2013 @01:48PM
(#5017210)
While it can drive two external displays, it only has one Thunderbolt port. The only easy way to attach multiple monitors is chaining Apple's Thunderbolt Displays. Other setups may require Thunderbolt docks or the like.
- Do I require the dedicated video card and is that video card worth $1000+ increased bill
So if you're only looking to do development, go for the MBA since it's better cost for use. The Retina doesn't matter if you're always plugged in like I am.
Your only question you should ask yourself is, do you either want to use multiple monitors which the MBA can not do or do you want to be able to play games that require the video card?
Latency to me is not a problem. I live in asia and there is internet everywhere. Would it really make that much of a difference for you?