(found in http://lib.ru/FILOSOF/EJNSHTEJN/theworld_engl.txt)
"'The World As I See It,' was shortened for our Web exhibit."
Thanks for posting the full text, the context and overall meaning is vastly different.
most rational thinkers understand that basic defense is necessary
I think he is looking at things from the perspective of the institutions' interaction with individuals - in particular, that those individuals subjugated to the military or similar institutions are an enormous waste of potential. This part, in particular, speaks to that notion:
"He who joyfully marches to music, rank and file, has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice."
1. Or at least, there are slightly different versions out there: http://rescomp.stanford.edu/~cheshire/EinsteinQuotes.html
Of course, I'd like to think that he realizes that the same system he abhors ultimately crushed that evil, but sometimes emotion can run deep. He wasn't immune to human feeling.
Paraphrasing Gandhi and Einstein,
There are many causes I am willing to die for, but none I am willing to kill for.
"Self-Defence" is a subjective term that can easily be twisted towards a desired goal - any educated American should realize that.
"The text of Albert Einstein's copyrighted essay, "The World As I See It," was shortened for our Web exhibit."
This paragraph in particular seems awkward in the flow of the essay, and the ellipses suggests the re-author/exhibitor is likely liberally oversimplifying quite a bit:
"This topic brings me to that worst outcrop of herd life, the military system, which I abhor... This plague-spot of civilization ought to be abolished with all possible speed. Heroism on command, senseless violence, and all the loathsome nonsense that goes by the name of patriotism -- how passionately I hate them!"
I don't think anyone likes gung-ho destructive violent force, but most rational thinkers understand that basic defense is necessary to at least some extent. Or at least, it's been historically necessary in the past. I'm going to guess Einstein's point was much more sophisticated and nuanced in the original, unedited work.
Still a beautiful piece with beautiful ideas, but selective editing of great thinkers always scares the hell out of me.