Re:Krea 3 – Frontier Image Model 4× faster than Nano Banana Pro
by dadoum on Thursday October 15, 2026 @12:57PM
(#50106596)
Why is there no comparison with FLUX 3 Image? I am not a big user of image models so maybe those are in different categories (or maybe it's not a relevant frontier model?). Just curious.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Krea 3 – Frontier Image Model 4× faster than Nano Banana Pro
by dvrp on Thursday October 15, 2026 @01:00PM
(#50106656)
We focused partly on the frontier ones that most people use or recognize. We have some usage data from free users as well as what people talk in social media.
But there’s a whole plethora of worthy models (e.g. flux family, seedream, qwen, etc.) that are not mentioning purely cuz marketing and to avoid complicating the site too much. We hope to release a more technical report soon.
Re:Krea 3 – Frontier Image Model 4× faster than Nano Banana Pro
by dadoum on Thursday October 15, 2026 @05:00PM
(#50110151)
Thank you for your answer
Re:Krea 3 – Frontier Image Model 4× faster than Nano Banana Pro
by serf on Thursday October 15, 2026 @02:03PM
(#50107633)
one thought : flux is open weight and available; krea is 'self-hosted capable with enterprise license agreement, contact us...' in the FAQ.
Maybe they don't want to make potential customers aware of competitive alternatives.