News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why are chip companies allergic to open source? by chris_money202 on Thursday October 15, 2026 @10:40AM (#50104370)
The EDA tools also have close relationships with the fabs like TSMC. Their moats aren't necessarily the software, it's that relationship and the ability to update the software for the latest process.

Open source would always be behind, the fabs don't want other fabs knowing about their process which is why its secluded behind the EDA tools with NDAs.

Re:Why are chip companies allergic to open source? by xw333 on Thursday October 15, 2026 @05:16PM (#50110391)
The moat of the closed source EDA tools is the validation hours that went into them.

I use the open source EDA tools for VLSI everyday and I do like them, especially how hackable they are, but they are very unreliable compared to the closed source tools, and that's not the highest bar.

Run time of the open source EDA tools are also very slow for designs over, say, ~250K gates. And that's an issue when in commercial designs the base unit for measuring the number of gates in a macro is megacells, i.e. 10^6 cells. Much of the effort of the commercial tools has just been keeping up with Moore's law which is not easy when many brute-force form EDA algorithms are like n^3 even with heuristics.