News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fingerprints Are the New Cookies by jsmailes on Monday October 12, 2026 @07:59AM (#50055101)
Firefox offers it: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/global-privacy-control

They don't seem to call it GPC, but their "ask websites not to track" feature now uses it instead of GPC.

Re:Fingerprints Are the New Cookies by stingraycharles on Monday October 12, 2026 @08:56AM (#50055770)
Yes ok, and Firefox was also the only browser that offered DNT, which is why it pretty much died.
Re:Fingerprints Are the New Cookies by flaburgan on Monday October 12, 2026 @09:47AM (#50056425)
It's the complete opposite. What killed DNT is Microsoft adding it to their browser and set it to true by default, pretending they cared about their users. Doing so, it was not the expression of the users anymore and so web developers ignored it, and so it died.
Re:Fingerprints Are the New Cookies by FabHK on Monday October 12, 2026 @10:23AM (#50056894)
Sorry, that does seem like a reasonable default. This is the fault of web developers to not respect it, not Microsoft. Nice cope.
Re:Fingerprints Are the New Cookies by stingraycharles on Tuesday October 13, 2026 @12:10AM (#50066581)
I think you’re missing the point that this caused a backlash from the ad industry / publishers that suddenly stopped recognizing these headers, otherwise it would impact their bottom line too much. Obviously it’s a good default from a user’s perspective.
Re:Fingerprints Are the New Cookies by weberer on Monday October 12, 2026 @09:37AM (#50056292)
It died because companies had no incentive to respect it. The writers of the GDPR could have easily added a single line saying you had to respect the DNT header, but they chose not to.
Re:Fingerprints Are the New Cookies by hiccuphippo on Monday October 12, 2026 @11:25AM (#50057809)
I wonder how many websites use that header as part of their fingerprint mechanism.