Re:Telegram Desktop vulnerability allowed any user's file to...
by brendyn on Saturday October 10, 2026 @08:17PM
(#50038436)
You can pay money to register without a phone number
https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/11197884108826-...
Re:Telegram Desktop vulnerability allowed any user's file to...
by codedokode on Saturday October 10, 2026 @08:47PM
(#50038642)
Requires Apple or Google Pay, linked to a phone number and a bank card, crypto not accepted.
Re:Telegram Desktop vulnerability allowed any user's file to...
by TeMPOraL on Saturday October 10, 2026 @07:27PM
(#50038164)
> What Western genius thought of such a feature, displaying a phone number in a group chat?
Well, most of those apps try to inject themselves in between you and the rest of the world, by "helpfully" offering to be your SMS handler and phone call replacement.
No thanks.
Re:Telegram Desktop vulnerability allowed any user's file to...
by drnick1 on Saturday October 10, 2026 @08:42PM
(#50038605)
I am not sure what you mean by "Western messengers" exactly. If it's Whatsapp, then I don't think it's any better than Telegram, even though Whatsapp claims to provide E2EE. The entire stack is closed source, and in any case it leaks huge amounts of metadata.
And no, Signal is not inferior. If you are really concerned about the phone number issue, use a burner eSIM or purchase a Signal account. Last time I checked though, payment was tied to Apple/Google, inexplicably.
Telegram also allows to delete any chat in one click. Telegram has support for HTTP, SOCKS, MTPROTO and WEB proxies to evade censorship, Western messengers do not. Telegram is written in C++. Although it is a piece of proprietary garbage and might be connected to the government, at least it is well made piece.
Also it became difficult to register in Telegram, it often asks for 1 euro when trying to register with a fake number. And with a real number the OTP code simply doesn't get delivered to Russia.