Re:Telegram Desktop vulnerability allowed any user's file to...
by codedokode on Saturday October 10, 2026 @07:01PM
(#50038020)
Signal requires a phone number and does not want anonymous users, so I do not want it too.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Telegram Desktop vulnerability allowed any user's file to...
by dimatter on Saturday October 10, 2026 @08:29PM
(#50038510)
so does Telegram
Re:Telegram Desktop vulnerability allowed any user's file to...
by codedokode on Saturday October 10, 2026 @08:50PM
(#50038660)
But Matrix does not. I wish they removed email requirement too though.
Re:Telegram Desktop vulnerability allowed any user's file to...
by wolvoleo on Saturday October 10, 2026 @10:02PM
(#50039094)
It depends on the matrix server, they don't have to require an email address per se.
Re:Telegram Desktop vulnerability allowed any user's file to...
by drnick1 on Saturday October 10, 2026 @08:36PM
(#50038557)
The phone number is only required to create an account, and is never used again IIRC. The rationale for it was to prevent abuse/spam, but I believe there is now an option to purchase an account for a small fee without needing a phone number.
Re:Telegram Desktop vulnerability allowed any user's file to...
by codedokode on Saturday October 10, 2026 @08:49PM
(#50038655)
Purchase can be done only through Apple/Google Pay which require a phone number and a bank card on top of that. Do not be deceived by marketing people.
Re:Telegram Desktop vulnerability allowed any user's file to...
by wolvoleo on Saturday October 10, 2026 @10:01PM
(#50039087)
Yeah having to doxx yourself to avoid giving a phone number is a bit disappointing for a privacy-conscious messenger app.
Especially because they have their own crypto coin right there in the app so why not allow payments with that?